Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Friday, October 23, 2009
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
I feel really bad about the neglect of my blog since early summer. I have not been on the Motobecane since June. I am moving the Las Vegas and all my stuff is actually getting unpacked today. Thank you for continuing to visit my blog. I got a recent question about my opinion on the bike after one season. For the record I did NOT get a chance to race this bike and I only got about 150miles on it. I can say this though. The bike will take what you dish out. I took the Fantom team down to Moab Utah and that place is hard on bikes.
A reader just posted a question if I would take this bike over the a Trek EX 8. With a little research MY fantom team and this Trek are the same price ($2300-$2400) and I will guess equal weight. The Trek does have the new modern rear suspension design benefit over the Fantom but my bike specs kill the Trek. Here is the bottom line. PRICE what are you getting for the money. MY large fantom weights 26.5 pounds for 2400 bucks. I have the best parts on the market and the bike performs just fine as a cross country bike. When I went to Moab I took my Giant XO. This bike has 5 inches of travel like my Motobecane but the suspension technology on my Giant is awesome. The bike rides like on a cloud. Always soft and never a harsh hit from an obstacle. But the Giant that I put together retailed for $4200. The Motobecane Fantom uses an older style 4 bar with the pivot on the seat stay. This makes the axel path not as smooth and a harsher hit over obstacles. But it works. Its not as smooth as my Giant or a Blur but it works and its cheap. The question is what are you willing to pay for for what you want to do?
Saturday, June 13, 2009
I took the Motobecane to Moab for a little test and decied to ride in on the 24 hours course used for the 24 Hours of Moab every october. I am pretty familier with this trail which offers many different types of terrain to give a trutest of cross county preformance.
I love this first picture with the sun light coming through that tree.
I have to appologise because my picutres will not move from where I have them placed. So I will just write and not worry about it.
The course is about 13 miles with lots of rock, sand, climbs, decents, just about everything.
The picture below shows one of many rock climbs that are on the course. That is literally a rock garden. You see very little dirt along there. The bike climbed great over all the rocks I took it through.


Tuesday, June 2, 2009
Sorry Everyone
Thanks for coming to my blog.
Saturday, May 9, 2009
New Chain. Sorry KMC
Sunday, May 3, 2009
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Shimano XTR vs Vuelta XRP Team Wheelset
Balanced spoke pattern for increased lateral stiffness
Scandium alloy rim
Ultra thin wall rim with reinforced spoke holes
Tubeless & tube tire compatible
Angular contact bearings
New quicker engagement freehub body
Center Lock rotor mount system
XTR 12-34 Cassette $235. eBay $140
Here is the Vuelta Team SL Disc wheelset with all the parts.
Final wheelset built up. 9 ounces lighter. Keep in mind though that this has the XT cassette on it which is heavier than the XTR but the tire and tube combo is lighter than the Michelin UST tire that I chose to put on the XTR wheelset.
I have ridden Hutchinson Python tires for a long time because they are light and have tall side walls offering a big tire for a 2.0
Tuesday, March 31, 2009

The above bike is a 2009 Kona Hei Hei Supreme. Sorry the picture is so small. Now this is a nice bike with a Scandium frame, full XTR, and Crossmax SLR wheels. Kona chose to put their pivot on the seat stay to avoid having to pay Specialized a bunch of money. This suspension design should ride very similar to the Fantom Team. The big difference is the price. This bike retails for $6499 and my Motobecane was $2353. The Kona might be a pound or so lighter but a $4146 is a BIG difference.
This next bike is a Scott Spark Limited retailing for for $12,419. I used to work at a shop that sold a few of these and they are awesome. These bikes weight about 21-22 pounds. I rode a full XTR version of one of these and it was nice. Once again though, look where the gold rear pivot is on the frame. The bottom of the seat stay. This frame would have a similar ride to the Fantom Team.I heard the Fantom Team called a parts dump. This means that the frame is cheap with nice parts. This is a incorrect assumption. Stay tuned to my Blog and I prove you all wrong.
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
I want to explain the difference between the Fantom's 4 bar linkage and the ever so popular Specialized 4 bar design. There may be more to it for all you engineer types out their but the difference is the placement of one very patent protected chain stay pivot. Below is a picture of an Ellsworth which licenses Specializes 4 bar design.
You can see the pivot at the end of the chain stay right above the rear derailleur and before the derailleur hanger.This picture shows the Fantom's pivot at the bottom of the chain stay right above the hanger. Here is some info on the 4 bar lingage system with a pivot on the seat stay that I put together doing some research.
- A four-bar, seat-stay pivot suspension is similar looking, having a pivot above the drop out instead of in front of the drop out (ie no Horst Link and no patent problem). Having the pivot in front of the drop out (i.e. on the chain stay) allows the linkage components to affect the path of the rear axle, thereby allowing for a more complex arc of the axle path. Placing the pivot on the seat stay (above the drop out) effectively makes the rear axle travel path more like that of a single-pivot bike, since the chain stay is the only component that affects the rear axle's arc.
Seat-stay four-link pivot bikes perform exactly like similarly placed monopivots under acceleration and chain forces, which means they aren't as neutral under acceleration as Horst-link, four-bar bikes, dw-link, or Split Pivot bikes. However, when brakes are mounted on the seat stays, dw-link, Split Pivot and FSR four-link bikes have an advantage while braking over rough ground. One manufacturer well known for their long-time use of the seat-stay pivot four-bar link suspension is Kona, who incorporate the design on their entire line-up, along with other manufacturers such as Infiza and Icon. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_suspension)
So basically what this is saying is a 4 bar linkage system with the pivot on the seat stay does not have a smooth rear axle arch as compared to the 4 bar lingage with the pivot on the seat stay. Also the rear suspension will have a tendency to lock up a little while using the rear brake.
